I spent some time standing in front of my bookshelves yesterday thinking about which books have made me "wrestle with big questions". The one I remembered most vividly was Never Let Me Go by Kazuo Ishiguro, which I read last summer. The moral question raised in this book rattled me so much that I remember telling other people to read the book just so I could hear their reaction. The story is set in England in the late 1990's and Laura (the narrator) is a "carer". (The meaning of carer is not revealed until later. As a child she lived at Hailsham which was an idyllic private school in the English countryside. She and the other children that lived there were treated as "special". There was a tremendous focus on fostering the students' creative abilities, especially in poetry and art. Students whose work was exceptional was kept by Madame for her "gallery". Students were also encouraged to keep themselves healthy; there was a strict no smoking policy. The true reason for the children being at Hailsham was revealed when one of the teachers told the students the truth.
"If you're going to have decent lives, then you've got to know and know properly. None of you will go to America, none of you will be film stars. And none of you will be working in supermarkets as I heard some of you planning the other day. You'll become adults , then before you're old, before you're even middle-aged, you'll start to donate your vital organs. That's what each of you was created to do." (p.81)
This was shocking to me! All of these children had been cloned simply to be there as "spare parts". After Hailsham, Kathy, and her friends Tommy and Ruth moved to "the cottages" where they met other clones. At one point, Rodney and Chrissie told Ruth that they thought that they had seen her "possible" (the person whom she was modelled from). All of them went to a nearby town to observe this woman, whom they later decided could not have been her possible.
"We all know it. We're modelled from
trash. Junkies, prostitutes, winos, tramps. Convicts, maybe, just so long as they aren't psychos. That's what we come from....If you want to look for possibles, if you want to do it properly, then you look in the gutter. You look in rubbish bins. Look down the toilet, that's where you'll find where we all came from." (p.166)
While they were living in the cottages they were all aware that soon they would have to train, first as carers ( people who will care for the clones who are the donors) and following that they would begin receiving notifications about making their own donations. The question of whether a deferral could be granted comes up. Rodney and Chrissie had heard that if a couple could prove that they were truly in love that they could put off their donations for a few years, although the rumor was unfounded. This led to Tommy's thought that perhaps that's why Madame kept the best artwork for her gallery. Artwork is a window to the soul; perhaps she was trying to prove that they had souls. Poor Tommy! He had never gotten a piece of artwork into the Gallery. He began drawing a book of very minute, detailed animals and expressed his desire to find Madame and show them to her in the hopes that he might get a deferrment.
There is one great scene where Tommy buys a cassette of a tape that Kathy had lost years ago. It seems to parallel the idea of cloning.
"Do you think it could be the same one? I mean. the
actual one? The one you lost?"
I don't want to spoil the ending for all of you. Not only was I riveted by great character development but I was so disturbed by the realness of this book. The world does want cures , as it's stated on p.262
" ...all these new possibilities laid before us, all these ways to cure many previously incurable conditions. That is what the world noticed the most, wanted the most. And for a long time people preferred to believe that these organs appeared from nowhere, or at most that they grew in a kind of vacuum. Yes, there
were arguments. But by the time people became concerned about ...about
students, by the time they came to consider just how you were reared, whether you should have been brought into existence at all, well by then it was too late. There was no way to reverse the process. How can you ask a world that has come to regard cancer as curable, how can you ask such a world to put away that cure, to go back to the dark days? There was no going back. However uncomfortable people were about your existence, their overwhelming concern was that their own children, their spouses, their parents, their friends, did not die from cancer, motor neurone disease, heart disease. So for a long time you were kept in the shadows, and people did their best not to think about you. And if they did, they tried to convince themselves you weren't really like us. That you were less than human, so it didn't matter."
Boy did this give me pause to think, and think, and think. Is cloning moral? Under what circumstances? At what point does science go too far? How did my own faith factor into this?How did I feel about stem cell research? How would I feel if my child was in need of an organ? Would it matter where it came from? Who wouldn't want the best for their child? For their child not to suffer? But at what cost? And the whole question of a clone having a soul..or not...
Never Let Me Go gets to the very heart of morality. I was left with many more questions than answers.